Friday, 13 May 2011
Tuesday, 10 May 2011
The FTSE 100 cyclically adjusted PE ratio (FTSE 100 CAPE or PE10) – May 2011
Now that I’m back in the blogging world I’ve been catching up on all the great posts that I’ve missed over the past few months from My Blog List (full list in the right hand sidebar of the page). Great UK based blogs such as Monevator, A Grain of Salt, Simple Living in Suffolk and UK Value Investor. This post from ermine at Simple Living has however made me think about my cyclically adjusted PE (PE10 or CAPE) strategy and whether it is the right thing to be doing. I am a big believer in the Keep It Simple Stupid (KISS) principle and if somebody like ermine can’t understand what I’m up to then have I made it all too complicated?
Monday, 9 May 2011
My Retirement Investing Today Strategy Works – And I’m Still Yet to Retire
I must first apologise to all the regular readers of Retirement Investing Today for the big gap in posts. My life has been somewhat turned upside down over the past few months meaning I’ve had to focus my attentions elsewhere for a period. What the past few months has taught me however is that my Retirement Investing Today strategy has worked even with me being still some 5 years or so from retirement. How so I hear you ask.
Sunday, 19 December 2010
The ASX 200 cyclically adjusted PE ratio (ASX 200 CAPE or ASX200 PE10) – December 2010 Update
The Australian ASX200 is currently 4763. Let’s look at the usual monthly indicators that I monitor every month for this index. My first chart shows the cyclically adjusted PE ratio (ASX200 PE10 or CAPE) at 17.8 which is up from 17.2 last month. The P/E ratio on the other hand heads in the opposite direction, heading downwards from 18.6 to 16.4.
Wednesday, 15 December 2010
This year my strategy is not adding any value - My Retirement Investing Today Current Low Charge Portfolio – December 2010
This blog is not trying to sell you anything which means that I can freely share with you both the positives and the negatives of my strategy. Today though is neither really a positive or negative experience with my year to date Personal Rate of Return sitting at 8.6%, compared with my Benchmark Portfolio which has returned 8.5%. Of course given that I spend significant time maintaining my strategic and tactical asset allocations many would argue that if I calculated the cost of my time then I would probably be behind compared to the benchmark portfolio which would probably cost a maximum 1 hour of time per annum with a rebalance at the start of every year. The only defence I have is that my portfolio has had to pay some fees (Equity ETF, Pension etc costs), even if I do try an minimise them, and also has paid some tax (cash is taxed at 20%).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)